UNCONDITIONAL PARDON FOR ROBERT JOHN SHELLEY W #36832
PETITION TO HIS EXCELLENCY, THE GOVERNOR OF THE
COMMONWEALTH of MASSACHUSETTS


I , Robert John Shelley, W #36832, Born September 21st, 1955: 7:24 P.M., in the Township
of Weymouth, Mass, currently incarcerated by The MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION having been convicted of and imprisoned for M.G.L.A. 265 1; Murder defined, since September 3rd, 1975: NORFOLK SUPERIOR COURT CRIMINAL CASE # 63982, do hereby petition, and am joined in petitioning:
HIS EXCELLENCY, THE GOVERNOR OF MASSACHUSETTS
By all signatories listed to this petition to The Governor of Massachusetts to use his powers under M.G.L.A. Const. Amend. Art.73, Art. LXXIII. Pardons ART. LXXIII. -- M.G.L.A. Const. Pt. 2, C. 2. 1, Art. 8. Art. VIII. Pardons: ART. VIII. The power of pardoning offences, except such as persons may be convicted of before the senate by an impeachment of the house, shall be in the governor, by and with the advice of council, provided, that if the offence is a felony the general court shall have power to prescribe the terms and conditions upon which a pardon may be granted; but no charter of pardon, granted by the governor, with advice of the council before conviction, shall avail the party pleading the same, notwithstanding any general or particular expressions contained there in, descriptive of the offence or offences intended to be pardoned. This petition is in accordance with all applicable Massachusetts General Laws & Massachusetts Administrative Code, in order to keep it legally binding.
Copies of this petition shall appear on Petition Online.com, as well as being distributed by supporters seeking additional signatories in support of and joining in this petition. All supporters collecting the signatures by hand shall verify to the best of their ability the veracity and identification of all additional signatories.
Because Robert J. Shelley has been continuously incarcerated since September 3rd 1975, for the death of William C. Dubbels, who was formerly residing at 402 Coronation Drive Franklin, Mass. from{1968-1975}. Robert J. Shelley is serving his thirtieth year of imprisonment. There is a compelling need for immediate EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY in this case.

There is no dispute to the following:

On September 2nd 1975,"thevictim" William C. Dubbels was under investigation by the
Franklin, Mass. & Mass State Police as an active Pedophile, Rapist, & Peeping Tom. He is also believed to have been a member of NAMBLA {North American Man Boy Love Association}[Entity being civilly sued in the death of Cambridges' Jeffery Curley, young boy raped and murdered by two of NAMBLAS' members.{The reason for the investigation of Dubbels was made by complainants known only to and withheld by Franklin. Mass. & Mass. State Police.}]
He was known by these authorities to ply young boys & men with drugs and alcohol; then Raping, Sexually Assaulting, and pornogragraphically photographing these Young Boys & Young Men naked involved in various sexual acts, both FORCED & CONSENSUAL depending upon who was a victim and which MEN were Dubbels' close ADULT Accomplices.
Police confiscated Three Suitcases of Man-Boy Pornography & three photo albums of pornographic photos of Dubbels featuring some of his adult accomplices; some of his Boy victims, as well as assorted loose pornographic photographs, NONE OF WHICH INCLUDED OR INVOLVED Bobby Shelley. These items were seized by Franklin, Mass. & Mass. State Police following Dubbels attempt to RAPE Bobby Shelley, and were excluded as evidence, despite that Shelleys' awakening to this attempt to RAPE by DUBBELS precipitated all the following events of that night, including Dubbels' death.
Robert Shelley was nineteen years old at the time, any alcohol he had consumed prior to going to sleep he did so with the blessing of THE GENERAL COURT, as the legal drinking age was Eighteen Years of age in 1975. If Dubbels attempt to RAPE Bobby Shelley while Shelley Slept had not occurred, Dubbels death would not have occurred.
All three psychiatrists and one psychologist testified that Robert Shelley had suffered a mental illness many years prior to the death of Dubbels. The Prosecution Psychiatrist, The Commonwealths' only "expert" witness testified that alcohol may have partially triggered a disassociative reaction in conjunction with Roberts' mental illness, and "because the alcohol may have partially triggered a disassociative reaction in conjunction with Roberts mental illness;" Shelley had lost his legal right to his defense of Not Guilty by reason of mental illness. This reasoning is no longer accepted by the Mass. Supreme Judicial Court.
The fact that Robert Shelley was sound asleep and not operating a motor vehicle, and had legally consumed alcohol, which may have", partially, triggered a mental illness he was unaware he suffered from, and Dubbels' Death was pre-empted by his attempted rape of Bobby Shelley, its very unlikely these conditions were conditions Bobby Shelley could have anticipated, yet the Commonwealths' position was it did not matter that Shelley was Asleep when sexually attacked, his earlier legal consumption of alcohol denied him of any right to a defense of Not Guilty by reason of mental illness, NOT GUILTY, or Manslaughter, voluntary, or involuntary and "NO" instructions on second degree murder prohibited consideration of second degree in violation of;
M.G.L.A. 265 1; Murder defined.

: Murder committed with deliberately premeditated malice aforethought, or with extreme atrocity or cruelty, or in the commission or attempted commission of a crime punishable with death or imprisonment for life, is murder in the first degree. Murder which does not appear to be in the first degree is murder in the second degree. Petit treason shall be prosecuted and punished as murder. The degree of murder shall found by the jury.
The Commonwealth clearly recognized by M.G.L.A. 138 64A the sale of alcohol to persons under 21 years of age was a grievous error on the part of the GENERAL COURT and the age was subsequently raised back to 21 years of age. M.G.L.A. 231 85T. Negligence action for serving alcohol to intoxicated person prohibited. In any action injuries, property damage or consequential damages caused by or arising out of the negligent serving of alcohol to an intoxicated person... by a person or entity serving alcohol... but for which no license is required, no such intoxicated person who causes injuries to himself, may maintain an action against the said person or entity in the absence of willful, wanton, or reckless conduct on the part of the licensee or such person or entity.
Clearly Dubbels attempt to RAPE Bobby Shelley while Shelley Slept after Dubbels employed his modus operandi of Willfully, Wantonly, & Recklessly serving excessive amounts of alcohol to his victims & to intoxicate Bobby Shelley to the point where Dubbels could gain the advantage of an alcohol induced incapacitation over a sleeping "Victim" for the purpose of sexually assaulting & raping Bobby Shelley while Shelley was completely defensively impaired, went beyond even the civil standard M.G.L.A. 231 85T, It was Criminally Willful, Wanton, & Reckless conduct; Behavior designated to commit a heinous criminal Sexual assault & the attempted of Rape of Bobby Shelley; a criminal action :M.G.L.A. 265 24: Assault with intent to commit rape ; weapons ; punishment ; eligibility for furloughs, education, training or employment programs. Whoever assaults a person with intent to commit a rape shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more then twenty years or by imprisonment in a jail or house of correction for not more then two and one -half years;... also M.G.L.A. 265 22:--Rape, generally ; weapons ; punishment ; eligibility for furlough, education, training or employment programs... M.G.L.A. 265 22:-- (b) Whoever has sexual intercourse or unnatural sexual intercourse with a person and compels such person to submit by force { Plying with alcohol to the point of incapacitation and defenseless impairment} and against his will, or compels such person to submit by threat of bodily injury, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more then twenty years; and whoever commits a second or subsequent such offence shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for life or for any term or years.
Robert John Shelley went to Dubbels' home in acceptance of Dubbels "invitation to a "non-existent party". Dubbels served the alcohol and there is no way to know for sure if Dubbels had drugged Shelley: as his modus operandi, according to police & private investigators, information excluded by trial judge, Robert Shelley went to the home of Dubbels as an employee of Dubbels White Hen Pantry,320 Chestnut Street, Needham, Mass., and agreed to stay the night at the request of Dubbels to help Dubbels open the store in the morning as an early morning milk delivery of his job. Bobby Shelley went and stayed at Dubbels' home as a gesture of friendship, not to harm or kill,he never committed the Crime of Murder M.G.L.A.265 1; Murder
Robert Shelley grew up in an environment of Child Abuse, Sexual Molestation, and a traumatic rape at age 10. He was subject to continuous abuse within and without the "home". He was trained never to speak of such things at any time.
The Texas Supreme Court recently ruled Psychiatrist Parker Dietz "knowingly provided false testimony" in the Yates case in Texas, inventing evidence that he was a consultant of a episode of "Law & Order" in which a mother drown her children and was found NOT GUILTY of Murder by reasons of MENTAL ILLNESS. No such episode was ever created, aired, and Dietz's testimony was intentional perjury-- He was rebuked and admonished by the creators of "Law & Order"--Dietz threatened to provide false testimony in my case because I refused to speak to him--This is evidenced in transcripts to my pre-trial hearings--at the time looked upon as "JUST " an allegation by a defendant. Dietz's report to the court that Bobby Shelley was "competent to stand trial", was accepted in haste in order to allow the Commonwealth to push an incompetent defendant to trial. They did this, despite a four month earlier ruling by the court of Incompetence to Stand Trial, ignored without the presence of a further report on Competency by the psychiatrist Dr. Leonard Freidberg who found Shelley incompetent, which caused the court to order a six month commitment to the Bridgewater State Hospital.
Robert Shelley had refused to speak to Dr. Dietz; Dr. Dietz's report with a finding of competency was a complete fabrication made without ever having any more than a discussion in which the patient refused to SPEAK to this psychiatrist.
I Robert Shelley, under the pains and penalties of perjury swear the information contained in this Pardon Petition to be the absolute truth. My Parents are almost eighty years old and not only the above circumstances, Shelley were drugged to the point of intellectual muteness on the Anti-Depressant Drug ELAVIL--causing him to doze during his trial, another compelling need to permit this pardon.
There is no doubt that evidence was planted, false reports by lead detective were sent to the doctors trying to legitimately EVALUATE this case, Police officials Knew the identities of both some of Dubbels' accomplices & Other victims in this case. Police officers perjured themselves on the stand, under oath, and withheld said information.
This story cannot be told in a few pages but all information contained herein, including all records of this case, will soon be available on YAHOO/ GROUPS: {See FREE ROBERT J. SHELLEY} By signing this petition for an Unconditional Pardon made in EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY the undersigned agree to join & petition HIS EXCELLENCY, THE GOVERNOR OF MASSACHUSETTS to PARDON Robert John Shelley W#36832, currently at SBCC--P.O. Box 8000 Shirley, Massachusetts 01464-8000. Volunteers needed to distribute petition & collect other signatories to join in Petitioning HIS EXCELLENCY, THE GOVERNOR OF MASSACHUSETT

M.G.L.A. 127 167

Current through Ch. 460, except for chapters 444, 450, 456, and 457, of the 2004 2nd Annual Sess

167. Person representing applicants for pardons, parole or commutation of sentence; statements

No person shall represent or purport to represent any prisoner then confined in, or at liberty after having been
confined in, any of the penal institutions of this commonwealth or then under sentence to serve a term of imprisonment
in any of said institutions, in the attempt to procure or for the procuerment of any pardon, parole, commutation
of or respite from sentence, unless such person shall first have filed in the office of the state secretary a written statement
signed by him and made under the penalties of perjury, stating in substance that none of the provisions of > section
one hundred and sixty-six has been violated, that such person is acting with the written consent of the prisoner, and
that such person has not received or been promised, and does not except to receive or to be promised, any money or
other reward for so acting, except fees or other reward for legal services, the amount of which fees or other reward and a
detailed description of which services shall be set forth in such statement. If any person rececives any additional fee or
other reward for legal services different from that disclosed in the ststement referred to in this section, such
person shall forthwith file in the same form and manner as the original statement an additional statement
setting forth the amount of such additional fees or the exact nature and extent of such reward, with a detailed
description of the legal services rendered for such fee or reward. Said statement shall be kept as permanent
records in the office of the state secretary and shall be open to public inspection at any reasonable time.

M.G.L.A. 127 168
168. Violation of sections 166 and 167

Whoever violates any provision of > section one hundred and sixty-six or > one hundred and sixty-seven
shall be punished by a fine of not more then five thousand dollars or by imprisonment for not more
than two years, or both.

M.G.L.A. 127 169


Current through Ch. 460, except for chapters 444, 450, 456, and 457, of the 2004 2nd Annual Sess

169. Copy of sections 166 to 169; printing on petition for pardon forms

A copy of > sections one hundred and sixty-six to one hundred and sixty-nine, inclusive, shall be
printed on the form of any petition, parole, commutation of or respite from sentence, but shall not be
deemed a part of such petition.