for an International Court to Judge Bankers' Crimes

  • Author:
    n/a
  • Send To:
    All the people and victims of bankers crimes
  • Sponsored By:
    ASSOCIATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CITIZENS WITH LAWSUITS AGAINST THE BANKS
  • More Info at:
ггг Petition for an International Court to Judge Bankers' Crimes

SEIGNIORAGE: THE ILLEGALITY OF THE TAX SYSTEM
FermiamoLeBanche&LeTasse
ASSOCIATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CITIZENS WITH LAWSUITS AGAINST THE BANKS (1987)
Legal Office (branches throughout Italy)
Hon. Alfonso Luigi Marra
telephone +39 3932039457, fax 06-47010444
www.marra.it - [email protected]
DOCUMENT #134, 02/11/20 (1ST EDITION 01/01/07)

SEIGNIORAGE. THE ILLEGALITY OF THE TAX SYSTEM

The legal reasons for suing in order NOT TO PAY TAXES, OVERDRAFTS, LOANS ON SEVERANCE PAY, ETC.

Consult us about:
- Legal actions against the Tax Commissions to contest the payment of taxes;
- Summons against commercial banks;
- Summons against the Banca d'Italia and the European Central Bank for the return of 29,000 Euros for Seigniorage + 20,000 Euros for psychological damage.

Undisturbed, under the eyes of a judiciary system that lacks a sense of honour, the central banks, including the Banca d'Italia (BdI) and the European Central Bank, incredibly private, practice the crime of primary seigniorage, while the commercial banks engage in the even more serious secondary seigniorage, and what it more, succeed in evading taxes to a greater extent than the rest of society, both in terms of paid and unpaid taxes.

After having concealed this, from the time of the Republic's birth, in the Parliament's proceedings (with the omissis, i.e. blanketed), it was "discovered" that the BdI is private (85\% banks, insurance 10\%, 5\% anonymous), like most of the other central banks; including the ECB, 14.57\% of which belongs to the BdI, and therefore to its owners.

This private ownership was discovered a few years ago, and attempts have been made to play down its importance, but it is the cause of the world's economic and financial difficulty.

Primary seigniorage in the BdI / ECB and other central banks consists of the following:

1) Ongoing printing of banknotes at the cost of paper and ink (from 1929, it no longer needed to correspond to a value in gold, and has never really done so). Banknotes whose quantity is known only to the banks, because the serial numbers are not progressive, so their meaning is not known.

2) Using them (the value in Euros, Dollars etc. printed on them) to buy from other States - Hear Ye! Hear Ye! - the same amount of the public debt in securities (BOT, CCT, BPT, CTZ).

3) Selling the securities at auction, recovering the money and leaving the State with the "public debt" invented by this crime.

4) Fraudulently entering as a debit the amount of the banknotes printed at no cost in order to "balance" the securities or the proceeds from their sales as credit, and to conceal these huge sums.

A cover-up after which (given that, as we shall see, the tax system is also unlawful), at a rate of 50\%, a tax evasion then follows for an amount equal to half the banknotes issued to "buy in return for" the public debt, for whose interest payments we must allocate a large part of the budget. Notwithstanding that, many deduce from the non-progressive serial numbers of the banknotes that their quantity is out of control.

A prime phenomenon of uncontrolled production by banknote counterfeiters and
then, as we shall see, their use by commercial banks at a value multiplied by fifty (secondary seigniorage), which is the cause both of inflation and the current illegal tax system, also created for dominion over the citizens by criminalizing them as tax evaders (offenders) and money launderers etc..

These crimes, among other things, and given the obligation of the State to pay the buyers the promised interest on the already issued securities when they mature, make the BDI / ECB responsible for the "public debt," as they have already received compensation.

5) Recycling the money cheated out of the public through central banks worldwide, including many which Internet sources indicate to be Clearstream, Euroclear, Swift and others.

These phenomena have upset the world, starting with that which is defined as inflation, but is anything but what one believes it to be, because it is the result of the production of money by counterfeiters (the banks).

We observe that if, for example, the global money is 100, and a counterfeiter (the banks) creates another amount again, equal to 100, when he puts it into circulation (spends it), on the one hand he misappropriates half of the real wealth, and on the other, brings the global money to 200, so it decreases its purchasing power by 50\%, resulting in a (socalled) inflation of 50\%.
This inflation would not occur if the State were to produce the money instead.

This is because the State, by law, could then only dispense it in compensation for goods, services, rights etc, in other words, making it "real" (covering it) with a parallel increase in real wealth which it receives in exchange, for which reason the purchasing power of the money would remain unchanged.

-Inveramento -making something true- (a process that I defined) which does not exist when money is produced by a counterfeiter (a bank), because the counterfeiter assigns it without first covering it.

What matters, ultimately, is not that my salary of 1,936,270 euro becomes one thousand euro, or that the State brings the global money figure from 100 to 200, because, whatever the global money figure is, or however it varies, it can only correspond to the total quantity of real wealth. What matters however is the percentage of global money that some have, because it corresponds to the percentage of real global wealth that they can buy.

I then define inflation as that phenomenon that occurs when counterfeiters introduce money by spending it, thus causing a decrease (to their advantage) in the percentage of global money in the hands of citizens, which corresponds to a parallel decrease in the percentage of real wealth that can be bought.

From this we can also deduce that the citizens have the power to make money real (anyone who produces it) by the mere fact of receiving it, since there is an underlying presumption that they do not receive it at no charge, but always covered by a service, goods or rights offered in return.

A picture in which, if a counterfeiter "lends" money to a unsuspecting citizen who spends it putting it hopelessly in circulation, but learns that it is counterfeit, owes nothing to the counterfeiter, both because the counterfeiter gave him nothing, and because the citizen will obtain the compensation from society for spending that money, not from the counterfeiter, and he must make restitution to society.

These are my reasons for maintaining that overdrafts, mortgages, severance pay loans and so on, should not be repaid to banks, and that if we wish to make the citizens' "debts" with the banks "real", in order to then exact them, it is necessary to first confiscate and nationalize the banks, otherwise their uncollectible credits are the claims of counterfeiters and fraudsters.

The collection of such credits will make the State extremely wealthy also by defeating the dramatic demonetization piloted by the banks to weaken and dominate us.

In fact, when money is produced by the State, in order that its production does not cause inflation, an adequate quantity must be printed, because that increases trade and is beneficial for the economy.

Allegations of violations of the Articles of the Criminal Code 241, 283, 648 bis, 501, 501 bis, 416, 61. etc. that are not made against any known subject but the only the known, direct and hidden beneficiaries of these crimes.

Counterfeiting by the Central Banks, including the ongoing misappropriation by commercial banks (their owners) through the mechanism of the "money multiplier."

With the money multiplier, the banks, according to practices that a prone and infamous regime doctrine takes for granted, but which are the height of criminality, make loans amounting to 50 times greater than the money they possess.

In essence, if Mr. Average deposits 100,000 euro in the Banca Intesa / San Paolo (44.25\% owner of the BdI), the bank will retain 2\% as reserves (rounding out, it is actually 1.6\%) and will loan 98\% which, once deposited in another bank, in a cascade system, will be loaned at 98\% indefinitely.

Until, not the individual bank, but the banking system, through a round of loans of an amount that is lower by 2\% each time, will reduce the initial 100,000 euro to zero, but it will have grossed interest on loans for 5,000,000.

Using 50 times over the same money that should monetize society, but instead used by the commercial banks to unlawfully impose interest on each of these loans of other people's money, for which they should only be entitled to compensation for the service (which has already been collected) while the interests should go to the owners of the money.

The current tax system is illegal because its main function is to force citizens to finance the purchase of banknotes (which already belong to them), from central banks.

More specifically, the tax system is used to collect, through other taxes and fees, the money already made "real" (or the corresponding securities) to be used for payment of the money to be bought (made real/covered).

Fees and taxes that will no longer be needed when the State no longer has to buy money, but can print it. If it makes the community pay \ cover (back) \ realize the cost with the goods or services necessary to make the required amount.

A system in which, I believe, only one fee should be paid (we can call it "general" - without compensation between giving and taking) on the consumption of goods or services.

Fraudulent mechanisms that, between primary and secondary seigniorage, inflationary processes working to their advantage, evaded taxes and illegal taxation, spill rivers of money into the banks, whose existence is therefore based on money illegally accumulated over time.

That is why, for the same reasons that one does not repay a thief a loan made with stolen money, the lawsuits can maintain that the banks should not be repaid loans, mortgages, loans on severance pay etc., but that the real owner, the community, should be repaid.

Just as, following the same logic, one should not have to pay the current taxes and fees.

Allegations that should be made, but safeguarding oneself with every essential legal strategy, and especially in the case of mortgages and fees, continuing with the suit, if possible, while paying them.

Lawsuits that we lawyers should begin en masse, also arguing, subordinately, in lawsuits against the banks, that the rate, particularly in loans, is usually a form of usury, and therefore, at worst, only the capital should be repaid; and even more subordinately, that which the law already recognizes as the illegality of compound interest, late credit payments, commission on overdraft charges, etc..

Legal processes formulated to obtain even a partial acceptance of the subordinates, in the first instance (often for high amounts) to then go on to appeal and supreme court, awaiting the evolution of the judicial system.

How lawsuits should be brought against taxes and fees, formulating here too, as the main question, the request for a ruling on society's non obligation to pay, given the illegality of the tax system, such subordinates, and all the other revenues requested.

Gangs that have imposed their rules on the world, codifying them in the current tax system or the famous Basel Agreements, all of which are ridiculously filled with words, ignoring the fact that they are just vulgar unlawful agreements between individuals.

Things that now, in truth, following the diffusion of this document, have become so well known that, to give a small idea, there is talk of nationalizing the central banks, starting with the BdI. But without ever questioning secondary seigniorage, which is the major source of their income through interest on mortgages, loans, credit cards, and so on.

Unlawful things because the interest should go in full to the owners of the money, and the State, when it needs money, should print, on its own, the banknotes, as is the case with the metal coins, which are only 2\% of the banknotes. Interest which is, however, generally a form of usury.

Usury which, consisting of secondary seigniorage as we have seen, in appropriating undue interest fifty times over on the loan of other people's money, is the extreme form (kind).

The printing of bank notes and creation of paper money by the State that requires an amendment of the Treaty of Maastricht and the European Constitution, circumventing by confiscating and nationalizing banks and eliminating the criminal factors through these actions.

The Treaty, the European Constitution and tax systems, written in hand by the banks, and with which they have attempted to rob the States of their economic sovereignty to hand it over to these gangs, but without success, because it is in opposition to all the basic principles of the Italian Constitution (bill of rights), the European Convention of Human Rights, and all other principles of the European Constitution and every other regulation.

The printing of money by the State is not essential also from various perspectives. It is sufficient that the State pay the ECB / BdI the mere typographical costs, or simply that the central banks, obviously, enter the banknotes they print as assets and pay the taxes: it does not solve the whole problem, but is just enough to give society some wealth and highlight the criminality of the present system.

Crimes whose disgraceful concealment would be useful to the lawsuits for the refund of the primary seigniorage to the tune of 29,000 euro per citizen and 20,000 euro for psychological damage.

Since those crimes are not provided for by law, there are no legal obstacles to removing them (the sentence [opinion] of the United Sections of the Supreme Court no. 16751/06 revolves around other cases because its citation in terms of primary seigniorage misses the mark.

Beyond, however, the efforts to deny the United Sections jurisdiction over economic policies of the States, here we ask for a ruling on not just banking crimes but on the breach of standard regulations as well, constitutional and international.)

It is not true that nothing can be done to oppose these practices of the ECB, like those of the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, Bank of Japan, etc., as well as the tax systems, because as soon as the judiciary, political and information systems begin to do their duty, these monsters will be defeated in a flash. And if they do not do it they will be defeated just the same together with their pimps, thanks to the Internet: the new ally.

Alfonso Luigi Marra

See also: The most important feature of banks: credit creation - by Prof. Richard Werner
http://leconomistamascherato.blogspot.com/2010/04/most-important-feature-of-banks-credit.html

and:
ECB refuses to release data on EURO credit lines
http://leconomistamascherato.blogspot.com/2011/05/ecb-refuses-to-give-data-on-euro-credit.html