No Additional Inyo Land Acquisitions by Los Angeles!
-
Author:
n/a -
Send To:
The Mayor of Los Angeles & Inyo County Supervisors
-
Sponsored By:
Greater Owens Valley Community -
More Info at:
It may not yet be public knowledge that the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (DWP) has intent to acquire two 55.97 acre parcels on Oak Creek (1155 & 1115 W Oak Creek Rd., Independence). They are zoned RR5, allowing up to twenty-two 5-acre parcels with eighty-eight residential units! These properties have divergence rights on creek frontage adjacent to the Mt. Whitney Fish Hatchery and are apparently important to DWP because it already has diversion rights nearby and wants better control of the area. DWP is currently appraising the Oak Creek property as a prelude to purchase.
Many are aware that DWP owns over 250,000 acres in Inyo County, constituting almost 4\% of its land and water surface. However, looking specifically at Owens Valley from Lake Crowley to Haiwee Reservoir (approximately 100 miles in length and an average of 15 miles wide), DWP can be said to own approximately 25\% of the valley floor! It is also well known that the percentage of private ownership in Inyo County is extremely low, less than one-half of what DWP possesses.
While most Inyo residents and visitors savor the open space maintained by this condition, it is apparent that the dearth of developable, affordable property has a stranglehold on Owen Valleys economic independence and sustainability. The population of fewer than 20,000 (in an area larger than New Jersey!) has remained virtually unchanged for over 30 years but shifted increasingly toward Bishop, the only economically viable settlement in the Valley, and leaving Central to Southern Inyo to slowly decay.
While serious studies may not have been performed, many residents believe there is not a critical mass of population and employment opportunities here, largely due to the lack of available, affordable, and appropriately zoned land for development. It is in DWPs interest to limit the local use of water such that its primary customers in Los Angeles may never have to worry about shortages.
If not for the tourist trade, the few consumer businesses on the 395 corridor from Olancha to Big Pine would probably be reduced to a hardscrabble minimum. Inyo has been called a ghetto County, meaning it does not produce enough goods and services to satisfy its own population, forcing it to outsource, often at inflated costs. It has been suggested that a mere doubling of the Countys population, spread evenly across the 395 corridor, would be a sufficient critical mass for a sustainable local economy.
The County has previously asked DWP to give up land, which it has done in tiny increments, insufficient to meet growth potential. Recently DWP put up some 75 acres for auction, but at their top-of-the-market reserve prices, only two parcels sold! Further, the City of Los Angeles Charter forbids DWP from selling any land with water rights without a two-thirds vote of approval from City residents. So once DWP owns Oak Creek or any other land with water rights, it is unlikely to ever again be in private hands, and certainly not with water rights.
Oak Creek is part of Independence, another town in decay, whose only grocery store has shut down due to lack of customer base. A hundred and fifty residents constitutes a significant difference in a town like Independence, but if Oak Creek falls into the hands of DWP that potential will be quashed when the rare residentially-zoned parcel is taken out of circulation.
Furthermore, the less land that is available for residential development the more valuable (expensive) the remaining land becomes. Owens Valley real estate is already very high relative to other rural areas in California, limiting home ownership amongst many families.
There is a need for action here. The Owens Valley community is in a struggle for its livelihood, and must not allow Los Angeles to acquire one more square foot of property in the County without releasing at least the same amount of similarly zoned property for development.
This alone will not make the County viable, but it is a step in the right direction. More pressure must be put on Los Angeles and the other government bodies who control 98.3\% of the County to help it grow enough to sustain a viable population and corresponding local economy. Inyos own zoning and skeptical, sluggish approach to growth must be scrutinized too.
Please sign this petition, share this information with others in the community, and express your opinion directly to your elected officials!
Thank you.
Many are aware that DWP owns over 250,000 acres in Inyo County, constituting almost 4\% of its land and water surface. However, looking specifically at Owens Valley from Lake Crowley to Haiwee Reservoir (approximately 100 miles in length and an average of 15 miles wide), DWP can be said to own approximately 25\% of the valley floor! It is also well known that the percentage of private ownership in Inyo County is extremely low, less than one-half of what DWP possesses.
While most Inyo residents and visitors savor the open space maintained by this condition, it is apparent that the dearth of developable, affordable property has a stranglehold on Owen Valleys economic independence and sustainability. The population of fewer than 20,000 (in an area larger than New Jersey!) has remained virtually unchanged for over 30 years but shifted increasingly toward Bishop, the only economically viable settlement in the Valley, and leaving Central to Southern Inyo to slowly decay.
While serious studies may not have been performed, many residents believe there is not a critical mass of population and employment opportunities here, largely due to the lack of available, affordable, and appropriately zoned land for development. It is in DWPs interest to limit the local use of water such that its primary customers in Los Angeles may never have to worry about shortages.
If not for the tourist trade, the few consumer businesses on the 395 corridor from Olancha to Big Pine would probably be reduced to a hardscrabble minimum. Inyo has been called a ghetto County, meaning it does not produce enough goods and services to satisfy its own population, forcing it to outsource, often at inflated costs. It has been suggested that a mere doubling of the Countys population, spread evenly across the 395 corridor, would be a sufficient critical mass for a sustainable local economy.
The County has previously asked DWP to give up land, which it has done in tiny increments, insufficient to meet growth potential. Recently DWP put up some 75 acres for auction, but at their top-of-the-market reserve prices, only two parcels sold! Further, the City of Los Angeles Charter forbids DWP from selling any land with water rights without a two-thirds vote of approval from City residents. So once DWP owns Oak Creek or any other land with water rights, it is unlikely to ever again be in private hands, and certainly not with water rights.
Oak Creek is part of Independence, another town in decay, whose only grocery store has shut down due to lack of customer base. A hundred and fifty residents constitutes a significant difference in a town like Independence, but if Oak Creek falls into the hands of DWP that potential will be quashed when the rare residentially-zoned parcel is taken out of circulation.
Furthermore, the less land that is available for residential development the more valuable (expensive) the remaining land becomes. Owens Valley real estate is already very high relative to other rural areas in California, limiting home ownership amongst many families.
There is a need for action here. The Owens Valley community is in a struggle for its livelihood, and must not allow Los Angeles to acquire one more square foot of property in the County without releasing at least the same amount of similarly zoned property for development.
This alone will not make the County viable, but it is a step in the right direction. More pressure must be put on Los Angeles and the other government bodies who control 98.3\% of the County to help it grow enough to sustain a viable population and corresponding local economy. Inyos own zoning and skeptical, sluggish approach to growth must be scrutinized too.
Please sign this petition, share this information with others in the community, and express your opinion directly to your elected officials!
Thank you.
47 Signatures
-
Jenifer Castaneda
-
Elaine Delaney
-
Andrea Kramer
-
Olivia Moreno
-
Alisa Lee
-
George Castaneda
-
Nina Weisman
-
Stanley L. Hudson
-
Bradley W. Wiitala
-
Dolores Zelaya
-
Paul M Bedell
-
Dan Miller
- Comments
- I believe there is only about .5 cfs of creek water rights that go with all of this Bell property. The cost to maintain this property in the future for this .5 cfs surely would not be allowed by the LA tax payers if they knew.
-
scott palamar
-
mark rich
- Comments
- Lone Pine is a town that is dire straits. This is a community that desperately needs community resources and is lacking in basic services. I have seen this town slowly diminish to what it once was 25 years ago. Both local and county involvement is at a critical stage. Lone Pine is following suit to other towns such as Independence and Big Pine. These wonderful areas are at the brink of "ghetto" status and will rapidly achieve that state if allowed to continue down the current path. Local Chamber of Commerce's need to move up to the 21st century and be more pro-active in the fate of their communities.
-
Marta Elise Johansen
- Comments
- В
-
Cynthia Freeman
- Comments
- Inyo county requires more benevolence
-
Ray Warburton
-
Sid Viscious
- Comments
- This petition is lame, I believe that property owners have a right to sell their property if they want to. Quit your whining and buy it yourself. Independence DOES NOT HAVE A HOUSING SHORTAGE!.
-
Norman Wilder
-
Colleen Hampton
- Comments
- no more water for DWP
-
Gail Dodds
-
Paul
- Comments
- I think it's stupid that they are going to take over the land and the water at Oak Creek.How much more land and water do they need to take over. They have enough land and not only that what the hell are they going to do with all the land. Look at all the other lands they own it's just sitting and rotting in the hot desrt they dont need any of it and Los Angeles dont need water we are already low on water enough pretty soon theres not going to be any water and the worlds just going to end and go and rott. If it wasnt for the DWP and the president or government, all the land they took over or going to take over. These little towns would be big like Palmdale, Lancatser and such others it's stupid
-
Beth Niehaus
-
James Niehaus
-
Jim Walters
- Comments
- Using public pressure on the LADWP to preserve the net 1.7\% of private land in the County makes sense to me. Public honor should keep the DWP from shrinking that 1.7\%, as every bit taken makes Inyo communities less viable. Im reminded of the old colonial powers whose only interest in their colonies was exploitation of resources. Wake up, LA, this is the 21st century, and the Owens Valley deserves better!
-
Stephanie Arman
- Comments
- Give me a break!
-
Craig Dahlberg
-
Roberta Hunter
-
Coralee Bennett
- Comments
- Let Inyo County have control over population and economic growth...not DWP! They have no interest in seeing this County prosper. They prefer to buy land and never let families be able to afford to live here. Im sure that many people are aware that a community needs to be able to offer families a viable and affordable place to live. Otherwise, that community will eventually choke on its own stagnation. DWP has no interest in seeing Inyo County survive. They only want property here so that they can provide more water to LA!! The property mentioned in the petition is a prime example of this. Let the politicians know that Inyo County is aware of the ulterior motives of DWP, and dont agree with their agenda!
-
Charles James
-
Sherrie James
-
Sharon Rose
-
Sean McClelland
-
Katie Mitchell
-
Rob Schultz
-
Carl McClelland
-
Jason McClelland
-
Danielle Katherine Laprise
-
Tammy Prickett
-
Susan Lehman
-
Kristina Hall
- Comments
- I want to buy a home but not affordable husband dwp employee
-
Stephen Hall
- Comments
- employee of dwp, want to buy home or land
-
Marlene Kragen
-
47
Signatures! - View Signatures
- Sign Petition