New Trial For Ambrose R. Hawk

  • Author:
    n/a
  • Send To:
    California Superior Court
  • Sponsored By:
  • More Info at:
Are you the Author?
In May 2005, Ambrose R. Hawk was falsely convicted of a crime he did not commit, His attorney failed to present known evidence that would prove his innocence. Therefore, his conviction was based upon the jury not having all the facts needed to make a judgment.We strongly feel with the new physical evidence and at least 10 new witnesses that are available to testify to the false allegations would give Mr. Hawk a fair trial.

Mr. Hawk has been charged with lewd conduct of a minor over the age of 14. In a she said he said case, there is no physical evidence or DNA against him. The first trial was strictly a she said case. In the alleged victims claim, she states they had an ongoing consensual sexual relationship for over a year in his home, where his wife and foster children were always present. She stated that they would have sex right under the noses of everyone and no one paid any attention. One instance she claims his wife was asleep in the bed and they had sex right next to her and she never work up.

The evidence that was not presented at the first trial includes actual receipts from a naval base, proving he was in another part of the state during one of the alleged incidents. An ex-wife who can testify to his sexual habits and the distinguishing marks on his penis, which the alleged victim said did not exist. His current wife can also verify this information. There are also witnesses who can verify that the alleged victims witness has filed numerous false abuse claims against other people when she was angry at them. Finally, Mr. Hawks first attorney refused to allow him to testify on his own behalf during the trial, even though it is Constitutional right to do so.

We are asking that the court grant Mr. Hawks motion for a new trial based on the new evidence and allow him the chance to prove his innocence.

We the undersigned agree that in light of the evidence not presented during Ambrose Hawks first trial a gross miscarriage of justice was committed, and we urge the court to grant his motion for a new trial, based on the incompetence of his council during the first trial.

We, the undersigned, urge a review and investigation of the new witnesses, as well as the physical evidence not presented, and its effect upon the trial, as well as the circumstances that allowed such a flagrant incompetence of counsel to continue through the length of the first trial

We, the undersigned, urge a the courts to grant Mr. Hawks motion for a new trial quickly in order for him to receive a fair trail that all Americans are afforded under the Constitution of the United States. We urge this in order to restore the publics confidence in the United States Legal System.

95 Signatures

  • Leanna Hawk
    • City and State
    • Palmdale, California
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes
  • Rik Ritchie
    • City and State
    • El Sobrante, CA
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • В
    • Other information
    • В
  • Rosa Caldwell
    • City and State
    • Hardin, Kentucky
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes - KY
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • Mr. Hawk should have been able to testify. This is his constitutional right.
  • Jennifer Stiley
    • City and State
    • Greeley CO
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Greeley CO
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • Mr. Hawk was not treated fairly and did not have a fair trail and should be considered for a new one. He should have had the right to testify in court.
  • Debra West
    • City and State
    • merced, ca
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes
  • Petra Cummings
    • City and State
    • Montreal, QC
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • no
  • Dawn J Hawkins
    • City and State
    • Palmdale,Ca
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • New trial,new trial,new trial, new trial, new trial
    • Other information
    • This man is innocent
  • Sonya Massey
    • City and State
    • Lakeland, Florida
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • YES
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • В
    • Other information
    • В
  • C L GAUDIO
    • City and State
    • wichita, ks
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes
  • Glen Post
    • City and State
    • San Jose, New Mexico
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • YES
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • A trial where all witnesses and evidence is not permitted is not a fair trial. If Hawk's own lawyer was the one that withheld the witnesses or evidence, he should be disbarred! Give this man a fair trial.
    • Other information
    • В
  • Angela Brick
    • City and State
    • Sugar Land, TX
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes
  • Meri
    • City and State
    • Lawrenceville, GA
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • В
    • Other information
    • В
  • Lisa Truesdell
    • City and State
    • Edmond, ok
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • YES
  • Barbara Stephenson
    • City and State
    • Traverse City, MI
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes
  • Allen
    • City and State
    • Austin TX
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes
  • MONICA ROBLES
    • City and State
    • SYLMAR, CA
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • YES
  • Sherry-Ann Stowell
    • City and State
    • Honolulu, Hawaii
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes
  • Connie Mitan
    • City and State
    • Yokosuka, Japan
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes
  • Sabrena Douglass
    • City and State
    • Youngstown, OHIO
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • please order a new trial...it's obvious he deserves it
  • Conna Condon
    • City and State
    • Torrance, CA
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • Do not allow media whipped up fear to cause this court to disembowel our legal system.
  • Valerie I. Hites
    • City and State
    • Fairborn OH
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes - OH
  • Connie Graf
    • City and State
    • Onaga Kansas
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • Please give this person a chance to prove his innocence.
  • jennifer cienfuegos
    • City and State
    • lancaster, ca
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • no
  • Kaytee
    • City and State
    • Willow Springs, MO
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes
  • Thomas P. Streeter
    • City and State
    • Seeley, CA
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • State of Wyoming
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • Consult trial transcripts where alleged victim recants own testimony on the stand
  • Laura Houston
    • City and State
    • chandler, az
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes
  • Jeremy T. Bouse
    • City and State
    • Pittsburg, CA
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • As a long time friend of Mr. Hawk I find the charges for which he is wrongly convicted of astonishing that the judicial system let this miscarriage of justice occur. A new trial with competent counsel and all facts presented is necessary to uphold the freedoms this country holds dear.
    • Other information
    • В
  • Joanne L. Watson
    • City and State
    • Pittsburg, CA
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • No
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • В
    • Other information
    • В
  • Robert D Hawkins
    • City and State
    • Valencia California
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes
  • Laura Hawkins
    • City and State
    • Valencia, California
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes
  • Cynthia T. Rose
    • City and State
    • New Port Richey, FL 34653
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes, Florida
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • В
    • Other information
    • В
  • Gail Lewis
    • City and State
    • Hamilton Ohio
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes
  • Brian J. Hall
    • City and State
    • Palmdale, CA
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Brian J. Hall
  • Kelli Carroll-Toledo
    • City and State
    • Sunnyvale, CA
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • Mr. Hawk is an honorable man in service to our country, his family and friends. He deserves fair treatment, consideration, and the chance to clear his name of wrong-doing.
    • Other information
    • В
  • Somer Dawn Dreisbach
    • City and State
    • Los Alamitos, CA
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes
  • cynthia holland
    • City and State
    • Sterling, MA
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • no
  • Alan Travierso
    • City and State
    • Victorville Ca
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes
  • Kimball Whitney
    • City and State
    • Minneapolis, Minnesota
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Minnesota
  • Joe West
    • City and State
    • Merced, Ca
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes
  • Tamara Ball
    • City and State
    • Lakeland, FL
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes
  • Colene Cobb
    • City and State
    • Bellevue, WA
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes
  • Doris Byrd
    • City and State
    • Williamsburg, Ky.
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes
  • Jeffrey P.Struck
    • City and State
    • Massachusetts
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • no
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • Did the testimony come under the hearsay evidence law.
    • Other information
    • AS this court may be aware,a he said and she said without the proper evidence is like having no evidence at all and the case should have been dismissed.If there was evidence to support the testimony,let the verdict stand as is however,if there is more evidence on the side of the defendant backing his testimony,grant a new trial, a lack of dna should have the courts alarm button sounding in that this may be a mere case of "crying wolf".I am a paralegal student in Massachusetts
  • Renee Shoemaker
    • City and State
    • Fort Plain NY
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes
  • Juliana
    • City and State
    • powell 82435
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • no
  • Erik Hoff
    • City and State
    • Westminster, CA
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • no
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • В
    • Other information
    • В
  • David Hall
    • City and State
    • Crestview, Florida
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes
    • Additional Comments for the Court to Consider
    • Interesting that the lawyer did not allow testamony from his defendant, kangaroo court?
  • Shellie Kioutas
    • City and State
    • Huntsville AL
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes, Madison County AL
  • Heather Corder
    • City and State
    • Jonesburg, MO
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • Yes
  • Britta Lucas
    • City and State
    • Valrico Fl
    • Registered Voter in the United States
    • yes