America Should Require President-Elect Barack Obama to Pass an FBI Background Check Before Granting Access to National Security Information
-
Author:
n/a -
Send To:
U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Congress
-
Sponsored By:
American Citizens for the Preservation of National Security -
More Info at:
On 11 June, 2008, Al-Jazeera TV (of Qatar) broadcast an address by Libyan Leader Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi to the Libyan people in which Qadhafi stated the following:
"Along came a black citizen of Kenyan African origins, a Muslim, who had studied in an Islamic school in Indonesia. His name is Obama. All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man. They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency. But we were taken by surprise when our African Kenyan brother, who is an American national, made statements that shocked all his supporters in the Arab world."
Although never seeming to come to the attention of American media, this address was very recently made public by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), and is freely available on the Internet (http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1791.htm). The clear implication is that President-Elect Obama's campaign was financed in part not only by illegal foreign contributions, but also by the known terrorist Al-Qadhafi himself (e.g., "we were taken by surprise", above).
Executive Order 13224, signed by President Bush on September 23, blocks the assets of organizations and individuals linked to terrorism. There are now 189 such groups, entities, and individuals covered by the Executive Order. If President-Elect Obama received and expended funds derived from entities listed on the Comprehensive List of Terrorist Organizations to campaign for the office of President of the United States, this would at least preclude his ability to obtain and/or maintain the security clearance necessary to execute his duties as President of the United States, and at worst, could be evidence of a foreign conspiracy to buy the Presidency. This possibility poses exceptionally grave danger to the U.S. national security.
The Supreme Court, in "Department of the Navy versus Egan", 484 U.S. 518 (1988), states that no one has the right to a security clearance and that the grant of a clearance is an affirmative act of discretion... only when clearly consistent with the interests of national security. We, the American Citizens for Preservation of National Security (ACPNS), respectfully request that United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) subject President-Elect Obama to a background investigation, including a comprehensive investigation of his campaign finances, before he is given access to national security information, the revelation of which could reasonably be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the United States.
We believe that no person should be granted access to Top Secret national security information by default merely because of the outcome of an election, if unbiased evidence points to the credible possibility of terrorist involvement. In light of the unique dangers, we posit that it is both necessary and reasonable for President-Elect Obama to be properly vetted before Inauguration, and that he be asked to stand up to the same criteria for trustworthiness that would be required of any American Citizen seeking access to classified national security information.
"Along came a black citizen of Kenyan African origins, a Muslim, who had studied in an Islamic school in Indonesia. His name is Obama. All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man. They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency. But we were taken by surprise when our African Kenyan brother, who is an American national, made statements that shocked all his supporters in the Arab world."
Although never seeming to come to the attention of American media, this address was very recently made public by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), and is freely available on the Internet (http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1791.htm). The clear implication is that President-Elect Obama's campaign was financed in part not only by illegal foreign contributions, but also by the known terrorist Al-Qadhafi himself (e.g., "we were taken by surprise", above).
Executive Order 13224, signed by President Bush on September 23, blocks the assets of organizations and individuals linked to terrorism. There are now 189 such groups, entities, and individuals covered by the Executive Order. If President-Elect Obama received and expended funds derived from entities listed on the Comprehensive List of Terrorist Organizations to campaign for the office of President of the United States, this would at least preclude his ability to obtain and/or maintain the security clearance necessary to execute his duties as President of the United States, and at worst, could be evidence of a foreign conspiracy to buy the Presidency. This possibility poses exceptionally grave danger to the U.S. national security.
The Supreme Court, in "Department of the Navy versus Egan", 484 U.S. 518 (1988), states that no one has the right to a security clearance and that the grant of a clearance is an affirmative act of discretion... only when clearly consistent with the interests of national security. We, the American Citizens for Preservation of National Security (ACPNS), respectfully request that United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) subject President-Elect Obama to a background investigation, including a comprehensive investigation of his campaign finances, before he is given access to national security information, the revelation of which could reasonably be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the United States.
We believe that no person should be granted access to Top Secret national security information by default merely because of the outcome of an election, if unbiased evidence points to the credible possibility of terrorist involvement. In light of the unique dangers, we posit that it is both necessary and reasonable for President-Elect Obama to be properly vetted before Inauguration, and that he be asked to stand up to the same criteria for trustworthiness that would be required of any American Citizen seeking access to classified national security information.
42 Signatures
-
John Michael Hall
- Comments
- The ACPNS will NOT tolerate ANY racist or violent responses.
-
Samantha Folb
- Comments
- I don't see why this wouldn't be encouraged. If President-elect Obama can easily pass the background check then no problem.
-
Robert E Walton Sr.
- Comments
- the end of liberty is near
-
Lisa Myers
- Comments
- I firmly agree with this.
-
Alice Sweazea
-
Rebecca Soares
-
Deborah Leeton
-
Alexander McBride
-
Chad
-
joni higgins
-
Marcia
- Comments
- We are not sure of his Muslim views and if he will change America in ways we do not want it changed. I think he is going to put us as a 3rd world country. He is sure working toward it.
-
Michelle Johnson
-
Nora Gutierrez
- Comments
- And have him produce the vault version of his August 4th, 1961 birth certificate.
-
Linda R DeGaeta
-
Wanda McDonald
-
Mary Mosegard
-
Amber Jenne'
- Comments
- I cannot believe someone who won the position of US President has not already passed a security clearance.
-
John Mets
- Comments
- stop this terrorist
-
Nicholas Lechnowskyj
-
andrew harrison
-
Alison
- Comments
- We need to keep the US honest! Can't do it w/a non-citizen president.
-
sam
-
Kathleen A. Farber
-
Fred Stephens
-
Charles Brown
-
Concerned Citizen
-
Chris S.
- Comments
- Is he even eligable to be the president?
-
Cody Haferman
- Comments
- I do not trust that man.
-
Michael McClelland
-
joe pizzo
- Comments
- why is obama referred to as black when he is also 50 percent white?
-
Tim Allman
- Comments
- This is not an option...must pass a security investigation
-
You Need To Get A Life Barack Obama Is The Best Thing to Ever Happen to America
- Comments
- Barack Obama is the best thing to ever happen to America
-
Alex Gouvin
- Comments
- Please show us your birth certificate to prove you're not Barry Soetoro, Mr. President.
-
Douglas G.
- Comments
- Obama is a SUBVERSIVE....enough said!
-
Loretta Helton-Fernandez
- Comments
- I agree
-
Stephen Johnson
- Comments
- В
-
Vivien Higgins
-
Kelly Scheib
-
James Crachiolo
- Comments
- obama is an antichrist. progressive, communist,anti american, dictator...
-
Garry Sheppard Jr.
- Comments
- 'Soft despotism' is a term coined by Alexis de Tocqueville describing the state into which a country overrun by self-interest might degrade. Soft despotism is different from despotism (also called 'hard despotism') in the sense that it is not obvious to the people. In a soft despotism, people may have the illusion that they are in a democracy, when in fact they have no influence in the government. Alexis de Tocqueville observed that this trend was avoided in the America that he observed only by the American's of the 1800s "habits of the heart" {quote from Alexis de Tocqueville's book Democracy in America }
-
D. W. Hanshaw
-
Clyde W Hodge
-
42
Signatures! - View Signatures
- Sign Petition