Freedom of Choice for Smokers
-
Author:
n/a -
Send To:
Members of the European Commission
-
Sponsored By:
ECITA Ltd and the EU Vaping Community -
More Info at:
We the undersigned petition the Members of the European Commission to: 'ensure that electronic cigarette products (and their use, hereinafter referred to as vaping) are classified correctly as General Sales Products and regulated appropriately for recreational purposes, rather than seek to define vaping as smoking, tobacco use or medical therapy.'
Electronic cigarettes are products which offer a genuine alternative for smokers which can satisfy the smoking habit without the significant and well-documented risks of smoking tobacco products. These life saving products have been widely available for over seven years and no serious harmful effects have been reported anywhere. They are considered by respected international harm reduction experts to be at least 99\% safer than smoking. Many millions of smokers around the world have switched away from smoking tobacco products to using electronic cigarettes some or all of the time. (Some continue to smoke while also vaping, but this at least represents a reduction in their smoking.)
These products have been developed, manufactured, distributed and sold by the Electronic Cigarette Industry, and have no association with the Tobacco Industry or the Pharmaceutical Industry. We believe that inappropriate and/or disproportionate regulation will put the public at risk in several ways:
by discouraging use, which will make an effective and attractive alternative to smoking as ineffective as NRT, such as gums and patches which are known to fail 93\% in the longer term;
by encouraging an unregulated black market; and
by removing a reduced harm option for smokers who have no intention or desire to quit, forcing them to continue smoking, with the concomitant risk of passive smoking for those around them.
EC legislation already provides for suitable regulations for these products, with appropriate enforcement available for non-compliance. The UK Electronic Cigarette Industry has been working closely with its regulators, Trading Standards, to ensure compliance with the law as set out in these statutory instruments. Trading Standards agree that this is the correct and appropriate regulatory framework for these products.
The avoidance of inappropriate and/or disproportionate regulation is of considerable importance to the EC, as it is to the Member States of the EU. We are confident that you will seek to ensure that the correct classification is applied to these products. There is no need to create a new set of regulations for these new and innovative products, since they are sufficiently covered under existing legislation and regulations.
Proposals to classify such products as tobacco products or medicinal products are not based on fact, common sense, or the law. Electronic cigarettes involve no combustion, there is no tobacco, smoke or burning, so they cannot appropriately be classified as tobacco products. Equally, there is no sensible way to bend the legal definition of a medicinal product to include a recreational product such as this, which neither claims to be a medicine, nor has any medicinal effect. Electronic cigarettes do not cure tobacco or nicotine addiction; rather they provide the user with a much safer way of continuing to use nicotine.
Sale of these products in the EU is already covered by the GPSR 2005, CHIP standards (for packaging and labelling), CE mark regulations and Plugs and Sockets etc. (Safety) Regulations 1994, et al. The vast majority of electronic cigarette retailers already have policies in place to ensure that there are no sales to minors. We expect this to become standard practice across the industry.
Nicotine is not a controlled substance. On the contrary, it is readily available all over the EU. We suggest that making a legal action illegal, or regulating products like these out of existence with deliberately burdensome and unachievable regulation, because of moral judgements, misinformation or confusion with something perceived to be undesirable, is unjustifiable and morally corrupt.
Vaping (using an ecig) is a recreational alternative to smoking which should be regulated and enforced appropriately. Adult citizens can make their own informed decisions about the options available to them, i.e. smoking, medicinal interventions such as NRT, or recreational nicotine from using electronic cigarettes.
17060 Signatures
-
Katherine Devlin
-
Peter Cole
-
Simon Christou
-
kevin waddell
-
Paul Turner
-
Mike Bromley
-
Joanne Dring
-
Tom Pruen
-
Phi Corney
-
Graham Colthart
-
angela graham
-
molly thornton
-
Matthew Sorrell
-
Andrew Mann
-
Keith Lacey
-
Dave Kitson
-
Peter Coggon
- Comments
- After 43 years of smoking, i managed to quit straight away when i discovered these devices.
-
Ian Tellam
- Comments
- It makes no sense that the only way to use nicotine recreationally is through life threatening products. To regulate this in a way that limits the accessibility of these products seems disingenuous and is likely to be highly detrimental to the health of citizens such regulation is intended to protect.
-
Alice Bell
- Comments
- Having successfully used this product for almost 10 months; I do not consider myself a smoker nor do I feel I am using "nicotine replacement" it seems, to me, to be a healthier habit and one I enjoy seeing the benefits in my general health.
-
Ralph Hilton
-
Grant Gibson
- Comments
- I have tried to give up smoking for over 10 years and failed, I do enjoy the act and social interaction of smoking but I was very worried about the health issues. I have used a vaping device for over 10 months now and it has stopped me smoking completely, I still get the same if not more pleasure from vaping and the social interaction as well, Please help millions of others who won't give up nicotine have a better option in life and more importantly a chance of a longer life!!
-
Cliff Clark
- Comments
- If you are going to ban Ecigs you also need to ban cigarettes/tobacco
-
Ken Williamson
-
B Grizzell
-
fred cassman
-
Michael Clapper
-
Michiel Carmel
- Comments
- VAPESTICK's or Electronic Cigarettes are not tobacco products, To suggest is laugable !!! They need to be left within the current regulatory framework of the General Product Safety Regulations.
-
Dorothy Taylor, LPN
- Comments
- Electronic cigarettes have the potential of saving millions of tobacco smokers from the diseases related to smoking. Please do not take away this potentially life saving alternative for smokers.
-
Gary Hodge
- Comments
- The lack of public and user consultation on this is shocking. More must be done to speak to the end-users of these products, and allow those who decide to see the positive benefits of vaping compared to smoking. I for one will find any way I can to keep vaping rather than return to the tobacco alternative.
-
Paul Stone
- Comments
- I've been using an electronic cigarette for over 6 months now and feel a lot better for it. About half of the liquids I use don't even contain nicotine, so how could those be classified as tobacco or medicinal products?
-
A G Brazier
-
Michael Render
-
John M Paisley
-
Will
-
D. O. Paisley
-
A Blyth
-
Henrik Andersen
-
Lorraine Hall
- Comments
- vapers are happy & considerably healthier ex-tobacco users who pose no risk to others!
-
Chris Andrews
-
Derek Scott Jolly
-
Elaine Keller
- Comments
- As of this date, it has been more than 18 months since I switched to an electronic cigarette; my wheezing and morning cough have disappeared. Do not erect barriers to this much healthier alternative.
-
Shaun Allen
-
Anthony Harrison
-
Ann Barbara Bell
-
Pauline Martin
-
Mary Lea
-
Caroline Jones
-
Jennifer Hughes
- Comments
- A reliable, safe alternative to smoking regular cigarettes.
-
Jacqueline Plage
-
Adam Phillips
-
17060
Signatures! - View Signatures
- Sign Petition