Protest coconut ban in Madurai Meenakshi Amman Temple
-
Author:
n/a -
Send To:
Deputy Chief Minister, Tamil Nadu Government
-
Sponsored By:
-
More Info at:
Chennai 41.
8 December 2009
From:
B.R.Haran
Freelance writer
H6 / B5. Twin Roses Apartments,
68. East Coast Road,
Thiruvanmiyur,
Chennai 600041.
To:
Sri.M.K.Stalin
Honourable Deputy Chief Minister,
Tamil Nadu Secretariat,
Fort St. George,
Chennai 600009.
Respected Deputy Chief Minister
Sub: Governments proposal to ban coconuts inside Meenakshi Amman
Temple, Madurai.
Ref: Report in Tamil Daily Dinamalar dated 7 December, 2009.
With reference to the above, I, as a staunch Hindu and a devotee of Meenakshi Amman, would like to convey my total disagreement with the outrageous proposal of the government to ban coconuts inside the Meenakshi Amman Temple. I understand from the news report that the police has suggested this proposal and the HR & CE Department has also accepted. Since the department has asked for public opinions before 15 December, I am circulating this petition online, and it will reach you before the evening of
15 December, signed by all concerned Hindus.
Respected Sir
Coconut is an integral part of Hindu religion, culture and tradition. We dont have a single worship, custom or ritual sans coconut. Any coconut merchant would vouch for the fact that the temples are at the top of his clientele list, rarely next only to Hotels. We consider the state governments proposal as a huge blow to the religious tradition and culture. Also, it would certainly affect the livelihood of coconut vendors, merchants and farmers.
Police citing security reasons are not at all acceptable to us. It is the responsibility of the government and the duty of the law enforcers to ensure the security of the temple and safety of the devotees. When the police have so many other measures and strategies, their recommendation for a ban on coconuts is not only flawed but also hurts the religious and cultural sentiments of the Hindu majority. All these years the devotees have been fully cooperating with the police appreciating the security restrictions without any inhibition, but the present proposal just goes out of the limits of tolerance.
Respected Sir
It is a sore truth that majority of temples across the state are situated in a non-Hindu environment, as majority of the vendors and merchants doing business enjoying the temple lands for a paltry sum as rent are non-Hindus. Non-Hindus surrounding a Hindu worshipping place is in itself a grave security concern, especially considering the enormous growth of religious fundamentalism. While the threats from the jihadis are an open secret, the nefarious activities of the missionaries and churches in front of the temples have become quite common. The government and the police would do well if they correct the environment and periodically screen and check the non-Hindu establishments surrounding the temple, instead of taxing the Hindu devotees more and more.
Above all, the proposal violates the rules of the TN act 22 of 1959.
The present proposal violates section 25 (page 62) and section 105 (page 165) of the above HR&CE act. (refer : The Tamilnadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment act 1959 (Tamilnadu act 22 of 1959) by S. Rajaraman, B.A., B.L.,- Deputy secretary to government, Law department, Government of Tamilnadu (retd.,) - published by C. Sitaraman & co pvt. Ltd.- Reprint Apr. 2004)
According to AIR 1936, Madras 973, 71 MLJ 588, 1939 (2) MLJ 661, Section 44 of the law weekly 559, the proposal of the Madurai Meenakshi Amman Temple board seems not to know its own powers.
In a case (1969) pertaining to the interference by the EO in the Thirupathy temple in the size and cost of laddus the high court bench in AP containing the honorable judges, justice Vaidya and justice Sriramulu quashed the order of the EO on the basis that it infringed on the rights conferred by article 25 & 26 of the constitution.
Respected Deputy Chief Minister, I hope it is very clear that the proposal hurts the religious and cultural sentiments of Hindus and also violates the law of the land. Hence, I request you to kindly withdraw the proposal immediately.
Thanking You Sir,
Yours truly,
B.R.Haran
Chennai.
Cc To: The Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department,
119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai,
Chennai 600034.
8 December 2009
From:
B.R.Haran
Freelance writer
H6 / B5. Twin Roses Apartments,
68. East Coast Road,
Thiruvanmiyur,
Chennai 600041.
To:
Sri.M.K.Stalin
Honourable Deputy Chief Minister,
Tamil Nadu Secretariat,
Fort St. George,
Chennai 600009.
Respected Deputy Chief Minister
Sub: Governments proposal to ban coconuts inside Meenakshi Amman
Temple, Madurai.
Ref: Report in Tamil Daily Dinamalar dated 7 December, 2009.
With reference to the above, I, as a staunch Hindu and a devotee of Meenakshi Amman, would like to convey my total disagreement with the outrageous proposal of the government to ban coconuts inside the Meenakshi Amman Temple. I understand from the news report that the police has suggested this proposal and the HR & CE Department has also accepted. Since the department has asked for public opinions before 15 December, I am circulating this petition online, and it will reach you before the evening of
15 December, signed by all concerned Hindus.
Respected Sir
Coconut is an integral part of Hindu religion, culture and tradition. We dont have a single worship, custom or ritual sans coconut. Any coconut merchant would vouch for the fact that the temples are at the top of his clientele list, rarely next only to Hotels. We consider the state governments proposal as a huge blow to the religious tradition and culture. Also, it would certainly affect the livelihood of coconut vendors, merchants and farmers.
Police citing security reasons are not at all acceptable to us. It is the responsibility of the government and the duty of the law enforcers to ensure the security of the temple and safety of the devotees. When the police have so many other measures and strategies, their recommendation for a ban on coconuts is not only flawed but also hurts the religious and cultural sentiments of the Hindu majority. All these years the devotees have been fully cooperating with the police appreciating the security restrictions without any inhibition, but the present proposal just goes out of the limits of tolerance.
Respected Sir
It is a sore truth that majority of temples across the state are situated in a non-Hindu environment, as majority of the vendors and merchants doing business enjoying the temple lands for a paltry sum as rent are non-Hindus. Non-Hindus surrounding a Hindu worshipping place is in itself a grave security concern, especially considering the enormous growth of religious fundamentalism. While the threats from the jihadis are an open secret, the nefarious activities of the missionaries and churches in front of the temples have become quite common. The government and the police would do well if they correct the environment and periodically screen and check the non-Hindu establishments surrounding the temple, instead of taxing the Hindu devotees more and more.
Above all, the proposal violates the rules of the TN act 22 of 1959.
The present proposal violates section 25 (page 62) and section 105 (page 165) of the above HR&CE act. (refer : The Tamilnadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment act 1959 (Tamilnadu act 22 of 1959) by S. Rajaraman, B.A., B.L.,- Deputy secretary to government, Law department, Government of Tamilnadu (retd.,) - published by C. Sitaraman & co pvt. Ltd.- Reprint Apr. 2004)
According to AIR 1936, Madras 973, 71 MLJ 588, 1939 (2) MLJ 661, Section 44 of the law weekly 559, the proposal of the Madurai Meenakshi Amman Temple board seems not to know its own powers.
In a case (1969) pertaining to the interference by the EO in the Thirupathy temple in the size and cost of laddus the high court bench in AP containing the honorable judges, justice Vaidya and justice Sriramulu quashed the order of the EO on the basis that it infringed on the rights conferred by article 25 & 26 of the constitution.
Respected Deputy Chief Minister, I hope it is very clear that the proposal hurts the religious and cultural sentiments of Hindus and also violates the law of the land. Hence, I request you to kindly withdraw the proposal immediately.
Thanking You Sir,
Yours truly,
B.R.Haran
Chennai.
Cc To: The Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department,
119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai,
Chennai 600034.
2020 Signatures
-
B.R.Haran
-
T.C.Govindan
-
M Bhaskar
-
R.Venkataraman
- Comments
- Same as petition
-
RAVI
-
yashas
-
Ballakrishnen
-
n.srinivasan
- Comments
- since wearing burkha is also a security threat, can government thinkof banning it from temples, mosaques and market place!
-
T.K.Neelakantan
- Comments
- It is the responsibility of the Government departments to ensure safety of the temple and its premises as also the security of Genuine devotees. A total ban on Puja items is clear admission of inability of the Goverment in proper administrartion of temples.
-
Sunil G.R.
-
K Balakumar
-
Deepa Duraiswamy
- Comments
- Please stop interfering in Hindu worship.
-
Brig VA Subramanyam
- Comments
- В
-
Ravi
-
Sasindrababu
-
Venkat Swaminathan
- Comments
- It is plain and simple arrogance of power. It picks on any available and convenient excuse to hurt the sentiments of a large majority of people. It is sadism on the face of it.
-
D. PARTHASARATHY
-
Sreenivasan Rajagopalan
-
V . Subash
-
Ananda Ganesh
- Comments
- Ban Terrorism; not the Coconut Offerings.
-
K. Srinivasan
-
karthik
-
p mohan
- Comments
- Can this TN Govt. ban five time namaz with loud speaker which is creating all sort of noise ans nonsence atmosphare. what the hell is going on this nation. Cocuanut is allowed in every temple in India.Let the govt ban lodu speaker in the enire mosque. Then they will see the music after that. We hindus are sort target. it is the conspiracy of anti hindu govt an d anti hindu missionaries to wipe out hindus in India.Conversion activities is the number one in TN.
-
SANATH KUMAR V
-
vignesh pokala
-
shilpa nahata
-
Saravanan
-
Raja
-
Ramesh T R
- Comments
- Government should not meddle in any religious matters.
-
K Guru Rajesh
- Comments
- Government should not meddle with hindu temple rituals
-
AJITH BHATT
- Comments
- I oposse this strongly
-
M N Amirthalingam
- Comments
- Please do not destroy the ancient traditions.Devi Meenakshi is very very esteemed Goddess for the entire Sanatana Dharma followers.
-
Rohit Patil
- Comments
- Ban Stalin and his family from TN and India instead. Or better yet, make them useful. Throw them to the sharks in the Indian Ocean.
-
Srinivasan
-
sunilkumar.b
- Comments
- The ban would create huge protest against the government.
-
sivaramakrishnan
-
Srinivasan Swamy
- Comments
- Why can't the Govt leave Hindu's alone as they do other religions?
-
Vijayakumar A P
- Comments
- Please restrain from violation of the basic religious rights of Hindus!
-
R.K. Ohri, Pushpa Ohri and Anuj Ohri
- Comments
- The proposed ban by Tamil Nadu government is unethical and unconstitutional. Please stop the propsed ban on coconut entry into temples..
-
Sundararaman
-
Prashant
- Comments
- Ridiculous at best
-
K.SHYAMSUNDAR
- Comments
- This is unwarranted and not a matter of security
-
praveen
- Comments
- Jai Sri Ram
-
sunil
- Comments
- If no traditions then no temples
-
Gurunath Prakash
-
Redhish
-
Prasad
- Comments
- Laughable, idiotic, typically blind of the ground realities. Which paithiakaran tuglak's idea is this enlightened order?
-
T.R.Ganesh
- Comments
- Almighty will protect us
-
Shaw
-
Nathan Bala
-
2020
Signatures! - View Signatures
- Sign Petition